In his speech to the foreign ministers, Prime Minister Narendra Modi discussed the multilateralism crisis. The American secretary of state, Antony Blinken, concurred with this judgement during a press conference, albeit he emphasised that diplomacy permitted for workarounds. But certain unavoidable realities are hidden under the complex language and semantics.
Since the US invaded Iraq this month in 2003, multilateralism in international relations has been destroyed for at least two decades. Smaller and weaker countries are the ones who are most impacted by the breakdown, not the major powers who caused it in the first place. But, as the G20 conference of foreign ministers in New Delhi shown, such platforms are still useful in international affairs.
Source: Money Control
On the fringes of that summit, Mr. Blinken had his first encounter with Sergey Lavrov, his Russian colleague, since the Kremlin’s forces invaded Ukraine in full in February 2022. This crucial interaction between the top diplomats of the two nuclear superpowers at a time when neither Moscow nor the West-backed administration in Kiev are showing any signs of moving towards peace negotiations is an illustration of the benefits that multilateral events may provide.
Governments that are unable to interact with one another for domestic political reasons can utilise these occasions to send each other crucial messages and signals. That does not lessen the consequences of unsuccessful multinational attempts, though. Vulnerable tiny nations may only be heard through collective methods, whether it be in regards to climate change or the threat of chemical and nuclear weapons. When those fall apart, even the pretence of having laws regulating the global system also does.
Source: WION
India has been complaining about Mr. Modi’s complaints for years as it has pushed to modernise multilateral institutions. Nevertheless, major powers have just given it lip regard. Mr. Blinken and Mr. Lavrov might choose a far easier course of action rather than trying to find methods to overcome obstacles to international achievement. They might overcome them and reestablish faith in multilateralism.
What do you think about this? Share your views in the comments below.
