It has been a difficult path over the past more than seven decades, with both advancement and disappointments. The nation boasts the fifth-largest economy in the world, the most people per square mile, and a seat and a voice at the top table of international affairs. The country is in its current position as a result of the vision of the founding fathers and the work of the people, as represented by governments, organisations, and other institutions over the years.
Source: The Hindu Stocktaking is an attempt to assess the past, but it also provides an opportunity to envision and commit to the future. In his 10th Independence Day speech, Prime Minister Narendra Modi outlined his vision for the nation and discussed how his policies would affect the country over the next five years, the next 25 years, and even the next 1,000 years. While he spoke about longer time periods, which was foolish given the current state of rapid change, it is clear from the ideas and themes in his address that he was primarily concerned with the upcoming year, when he will run for re-election for a third term. Following up on his speech to the legislature last week, the prime minister delivered a speech that was quite political and included an electoral pitch. When he criticised the Opposition for corruption, dynastic politics, and appeasement and called for boosting probity, transparency, and impartiality, he offered a clear hint of the themes for the upcoming election. He also attempted to provide a positive picture of the developments that have taken place in the nation over the past nine years and took credit for them. It was wrong to use a political, election-focused speech as the I-Day address.
Source: DNA India NewsThe Prime Minister’s use of the third person to describe himself and make the advancement of the nation all about himu2014Modi’s guarantee, Modi has been fighting…, etc.u2014made it even more so. Exaggerations, evasions, and high-pitched language were all present throughout the speech. Manipur cannot be said to be at peace, and neither can the communal inferno in Haryana or the government support that hate speech and deeds appear to receive nationwide. In many areas of the country, there is still extreme poverty, hardship, inequality, and distress. Its elite institutions, as well as the freedoms and rights of its people, are always being contested. In his I-Day speech, the prime minister shouldn’t have discounted these facts.
What do you think about this? Comment below
