According to the Chief Minister, the decision to withdraw sanction was driven by a belief that due process was not properly followed in initiating the case.
The Chief Minister argues that the BJP government failed to uphold the rule of law in handling the case against Shivakumar. He contends that there were procedural lapses in granting sanction to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for prosecuting the senior Congress leader. The claim suggests a deviation from established legal norms, raising concerns about the integrity of the investigation.
Source:- the times of economicIn defense of the withdrawal, the Chief Minister emphasizes the importance of respecting legal protocols, asserting that the government’s actions align with a commitment to upholding justice. This stance is aimed at justifying the move as a correction of past oversights, rather than an attempt to shield Shivakumar from scrutiny.
Source:-NdtvCritics argue that the withdrawal of sanction raises questions about the government’s intentions and its commitment to combating corruption. They express concerns that such decisions may undermine the credibility of anti-corruption efforts and erode public trust in the justice system.
The case against Shivakumar has been a focal point of political contention, with the opposition and civil society closely monitoring developments. The Chief Minister’s defense serves as a key element in shaping the narrative surrounding the withdrawal of CBI sanction, influencing public perception and political discourse on issues of corruption and
Share your views in the comments
