A significant portion of the discussion is around how the proposed legislation balances security requirements with personal privacy. In addition to allocating satellite frequency, the Bill suggests regulating encryption standards for Internet communication and requiring biometric authentication of new clients.
This might essentially imply message interception. In the event of a public emergency or in relation to problems of national security, it also gives the Center the authority to halt or seize control of any telecom service or network. Although stopping Internet services is increasingly commonplace, seizing control of a network, even for a short while, alters its dynamics significantly. The Bill’s implied broader government restrictions call for precisely defined regulatory checks.
Source: ET Government
On the grounds of national security, the draft Bill gives the Center the authority to halt or outright forbid the use of telecom equipment from particular nations. It is obvious that China would serve as the benchmark, but the only way to really make an influence is to support a local ecosystem for cutting-edge technology.
Source: WION
The draft Bill suggests a licensing system to allocate spectrum for satellite Internet services, exempting businesses from having to bid for it. Such a framework has been demanded by foreign companies, who say it could more quickly and effectively deploy satellite services.
The administration must explain why it believes the non-auction route is the best course of action. There have been concerns expressed that some sections may cause the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s authority to be diluted. This can turn out to be ineffective. Utilising shutdowns and surveillance as routine procedures offers room for abuse and overreach. The draught Bill’s intricate details demand careful examination.
What do you think about this? Comment below.
