The claim that Prime Minister Narendra Modi informed Pakistan about the Balakot air strike before it occurred is unsubstantiated and lacks credible evidence. The Balakot air strike, conducted by the Indian Air Force on February 26, 2019, targeted alleged terrorist training camps in Balakot, Pakistan, in response to a suicide bombing in Pulwama, Kashmir, which killed 40 Indian paramilitary personnel earlier that month. The strike was widely reported in the media and drew significant international attention.
It’s important to note that national security operations, such as military strikes, are typically conducted with a high level of secrecy and strategic planning to ensure their success. The decision-making process and operational details are closely guarded by the government and military officials to maintain the element of surprise and prevent any potential interference or retaliation from the targeted entity.
Source:- India today
The Indian government, including Prime Minister Modi, and the Indian Air Force did not disclose any information about the Balakot air strike to Pakistan before its execution. In fact, the strike was officially announced by Indian authorities after it had been carried out, with the Indian Foreign Secretary confirming the operation and providing details to the media during a press conference.
Source:- news 18
Moreover, the timing and nature of the Balakot strike were significant, coming amidst heightened tensions between India and Pakistan following the Pulwama attack. The Indian government viewed the strike as a necessary measure to target terrorist infrastructure across the Line of Control (LoC) without escalating into a full-scale war.
Claims suggesting that Prime Minister Modi informed Pakistan about the Balakot air strike before it took place appear to be speculative or aimed at discrediting the Indian government’s actions. Such assertions often arise in the context of political debates and propaganda, especially in the fraught relations between India and Pakistan. However, without credible evidence to support them, they should be treated with skepticism and subjected to rigorous scrutiny.
Share your views in the comments
