New Zealand should strongly consider playing Mitchell Santner in the Pune Test rather than sticking with a three-seamer approach. The conditions in Pune have historically favored spin, and India’s dominance at home largely stems from their ability to exploit spinning tracks. This was evident in the past when spin-friendly pitches helped India secure decisive victories against visiting teams.
Source:- bbc news
Santner offers a left-arm orthodox spin option, which could be crucial for breaking partnerships and maintaining pressure from one end. Unlike a three-seamer attack, which might work well in conditions offering consistent pace and bounce, Pune’s surface may deteriorate as the game progresses, turning it into a haven for spinners. Santner’s ability to extract turn, along with his control in the middle overs, will complement New Zealand’s pace attack. Furthermore, his batting prowess strengthens the lower order, giving the team an extra all-rounder option.
Source:- news 18
The three-seamer strategy has been effective in certain conditions, but over-reliance on pace in a country like India could prove costly. Indian batsmen are known for their adeptness against pace, especially on home soil. Adding Santner into the mix not only balances the attack but also gives the team an additional weapon against a side that can struggle against quality spin.
Given the unpredictable nature of Indian wickets and the need for variety, New Zealand should hedge their bets by including Santner. This approach offers both defensive stability and attacking potential, which could be pivotal in a Test match where conditions can change quickly. Thus, playing Santner seems the smarter choice over a three-seamer strategy for the Pune Test.
Share your views in the comments
