CJI D.Y Chandrachud delivering speech at Bombay Bar association said that they are the guardian of liberties and no case is smaller or bigger. He also said that the dominant never let the vulnerable section people to get justice due to oppressed one getting humiliated and suppressed by oppressor.
Image credit: Live law. There is no case which is small enough, or big enough for I every court in the nation – be it the district judiciary, the high court, or the Supreme Court – because it is in us that the confidence of the citizens in the due process of law and the protection of liberty rests, and just through the lives of the members of the bar, who fearlessly espouse those causes, that the flame of liberty burns bright even today, CJI SAID. On marginalised group justice reality he said Groups that have traditionally held positions of power in socioeconomic (and) political context of society have an advantage over the weaker sections in this bargaining process to reach adequate morality…. Members belonging to the marginalised communities have little choice but to submit to the dominant culture for heir own survival.He also mentioned some cases which are perfect example of what CJI was saying, no case is bigger or smaller and justice to vulnerable section. The CJI said, A person who was founded guilty in case of theft of electrical wires and poles in nine cases, he would have to suffer 18 years of imprisonment, only because the trial 2 court didn’t direct that the sentences would run concurrently. And the High Court said sorry, we can’t do anything because the trial judge has not, in terms of Section 427 of CRPC, directed that the sentences would run concurrently. Which further justify the path direction in which our courts work. What do you think, does judiciary wasting it’s time while hearing bail pleas?
