There is pronounced complacency over the risks of escalation a year after the invasion. NATO’s plan was to supply Ukraine with the means to defend itself while averting a direct military conflict with Russia. In an effort to ensure that the conflict did not spread to other regions and that pressure on Russiau2014if not outright crippling itu2014would come from a coalition of western nations and economic sanctions.
Source: Firstpost
NATO tailored its military assistance to accomplish these goals. One year later, there seems to be increasing assurance that it is possible to maintain this delicate balance between backing Ukraine and directly challenging Russia. But the line might be subjective, just like with any security risks. One should not take this accomplishment for granted.
How the West and Russia are positioned; India’s concerns are explained | One year of war in Ukraine The heroic defense of Ukraine against a savage Russian assault was the biggest shock in the months that followed the invasion.
What do you think about this? Share your views in the comments below
