In his analysis, Mohan argues that this narrative has been employed to deflect domestic criticism and consolidate political power.
The “foreign hand” trope refers to the accusation that external forces or foreign countries are manipulating or influencing domestic political events. In Bangladesh, this narrative has frequently been used by political leaders to justify various actions, particularly when facing domestic unrest or political opposition. Mohan suggests that this strategy serves multiple purposes: it shifts attention away from internal issues, reinforces nationalistic sentiments, and mobilizes public support against perceived external threats.
Source:- news 18
Mohan highlights that while foreign influence in domestic politics is a real concern, the overuse of the “foreign hand” accusation can obscure genuine issues within a country. In Bangladesh, this has included corruption, governance challenges, and human rights concerns. By focusing on external interference, political leaders can avoid addressing these pressing issues directly, thereby avoiding accountability.
Source:- BBC news
Additionally, Mohan points out that this narrative can strain international relations. Accusations of foreign interference can lead to diplomatic tensions and hinder constructive engagement with other countries. It can also impact foreign investment and aid, as international partners may become wary of the political stability and transparency of the country.
Mohan’s critique underscores the complexities of using the “foreign hand” narrative in political discourse. While there may be legitimate instances of external influence, relying heavily on this narrative can be detrimental to addressing underlying domestic issues and fostering genuine political progress.
Share your views in the comments
