u00a0This metaphorical comparison draws a parallel between these parties and the generations of mobile network technology.
By labeling Congress as a 4G party, Shah could be suggesting that it represents a more advanced, modern, and inclusive approach in comparison to the other two parties.
This may allude to Congress’s longstanding presence in Indian politics and its broader appeal to various sections of society.
The term 3G party attributed to BRS might imply that it falls somewhere in the middle ground between the other two parties. BRS could be seen as a party with some progressive elements but not as advanced as Congress, according to Shah’s analogy.Source :- daily poirneer
Lastly, describing AIMIM as a 2G party could imply that the party is perceived as less progressive and modern compared to the other two. This label might reflect the perception that AIMIM’s focus is primarily on specific religious or cultural groups rather than broader societal issues.
Source:- cnv
Amit Shah’s choice of terminology aims to encapsulate his assessment of these parties’ political ideologies, outreach, and effectiveness. It’s important to note that this statement is a form of political rhetoric and can be interpreted differently by various individuals and groups. Shah’s jibe is part of the ongoing political discourse and strategy in Indian politics, where parties often use symbolic language to convey their viewpoints and critique opponents
Share your views in the comments
