The current diplomatic strain between India and Canada has brought External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar’s response into the spotlight, as he criticizes Canada’s handling of allegations around Khalistani extremism and other anti-India activities within its borders. Jaishankar has taken a firm stance, labeling the Canadian government’s actions as a significant breach of diplomatic protocol, and his remarks underline India’s expectation for greater accountability from Canada in managing separatist activities that impact bilateral relations.
Source:- bbc news
This situation unfolded after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused India of involvement in the death of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a prominent figure in the Khalistani movement. India has denied these allegations, calling them unsubstantiated and inflammatory. The Indian government has since restricted Canadian diplomatic presence in the country, underscoring the seriousness of the issue from New Delhi’s perspective.
Source:- bbc news
Jaishankar’s remarks reveal his frustration with Canada’s alleged leniency towards pro-Khalistani groups, as well as the potential national security risks such groups pose to India. He has repeatedly emphasized that Canada has a duty to prevent its territory from being used as a base for activities that harm the sovereignty and security of other nations. His vocal critique aligns with India’s broader foreign policy strategy, which increasingly centers on insisting on mutual respect and non-interference.
This diplomatic face-off also reflects India’s growing assertiveness in international relations, especially when issues of internal security and territorial integrity arise. As India continues to bolster its global standing, Jaishankar’s stance on Canada signals a shift from traditional caution to a more proactive approach in defending its national interests. Ultimately, his pointed remarks convey that India will not tolerate any indirect endorsement of separatist elements and expects other nations to take their commitments against terrorism seriously.
Share your views in the comments
