Former Bureaucrats, Military Officers Criticise Opposition’s Boycott Of Parliament Building Inauguration

Several former bureaucrats and military officers have voiced their criticism of the opposition parties’ decision to boycott the inauguration of the new Parliament building. They argue that the boycott undermines the democratic process and displays a lack of respect for the institution of Parliament.
The opposition parties had earlier announced their decision to boycott the ceremony, citing concerns over the government’s handling of various issues and alleging a lack of transparency in the construction of the new building. However, critics argue that boycotting such an important event diminishes the significance of Parliament and undermines the principles of democratic governance.Source :- TOI
Retired bureaucrat Mr. Ramesh Sharma, who served in various high-ranking positions, expressed his disappointment, stating, The boycott by the opposition parties sets a concerning precedent. Parliament is a symbol of our democracy, and its inauguration is a momentous occasion. Instead of using this opportunity to engage in constructive dialogue, the opposition has chosen to abstain, thereby weakening the democratic fabric of our nation.
Similarly, retired military officer Lieutenant General Sushil Choudhary criticized the opposition’s decision, highlighting the importance of parliamentary institutions in upholding democratic values. He stated, Boycotting the inauguration of the new Parliament building sends a negative message to the citizens of our country and undermines the sanctity of our democratic system. Parliament is a forum for robust debates and discussions, and opposition parties should actively participate in the proceedings to represent the interests of the people they serve.
Critics argue that the opposition’s boycott not only hampers the functioning of democracy but also misses an opportunity for constructive engagement on critical issues. They believe that attending the event would have provided a platform for opposition leaders to express their concerns directly to the government and engage in substantive discussions.
Supporters of the government contend that the inauguration of the new Parliament building is a significant milestone for the country and should be celebrated as a symbol of democratic progress. They emphasize that the opposition’s decision to boycott the event undermines the spirit of unity and cooperation required for effective governance.
The criticism from former bureaucrats and military officers adds to the growing discourse surrounding the opposition’s decision. It highlights concerns about the impact of the boycott on the functioning of parliamentary democracy and the need for constructive engagement between the ruling party and the opposition.
As the inauguration of the new Parliament building approaches, the focus remains on the importance of maintaining democratic institutions, fostering meaningful dialogue, and upholding the principles of accountability and transparency. The criticism from former bureaucrats and military officers serves as a reminder of the significance of these values and the need for all stakeholders to actively participate in the democratic process for the betterment of the nation.
Share your views and comment below