Former cricketer Sunil Gavaskar has weighed in on the ongoing controversy surrounding young opener Yashasvi Jaiswal and his use of the Decision Review System (DRS) during a recent match. The incident arose when Jaiswal, after being ruled out on a catch by the wicketkeeper, opted for a review, claiming he hadn’t edged the ball. The decision was controversial, sparking a debate on sportsmanship and the use of DRS.
Source:- bbc news
Gavaskar, in his usual candid style, pointed out that in his playing days, he never walked off the field when he was unsure whether he had edged the ball. He emphasized the importance of leaving such decisions to the umpires and the DRS system, which has been introduced to ensure fairness in decision-making. Gavaskar’s remark highlighted the changing approach to handling dismissals, with modern players increasingly relying on technology to overturn on-field decisions.
Source:- news 18
The DRS system, while designed to eliminate umpiring errors, has also stirred debates regarding its influence on the game’s spirit. Gavaskar’s comments, which indirectly pointed to his own approach during his illustrious career, reflect a concern over the growing trend of players seeking reviews in borderline situations rather than accepting the on-field call.
While some players, like Jaiswal, may use the review system to challenge decisions they believe are incorrect, others feel it undermines the traditional values of cricket. Gavaskar’s statement serves as a reminder of the game’s long-standing tradition of sportsmanship, where players were expected to accept the umpire’s decision without relying heavily on technology.
In conclusion, Gavaskar’s comments add an important perspective to the debate about the evolving dynamics of cricket, reminding players of the balance between using technology and respecting the game’s spirit.
Share your views in the comments
