In the second Test between India and South Africa, Ravichandran Ashwin’s role as the ‘fifth bowler’ raised questions, especially among former Indian cricketers. While Ashwin is widely regarded as one of the best spinners in the world, his usage in the match was notably limited. Former India opener Aakash Chopra expressed confusion over how the team management handled Ashwin, stating that it seemed almost as though they didn’t want to bowl him, despite him being a key spinner in Indian cricket.
Source:- bbc news
Chopra pointed out that Ashwin bowled significantly fewer overs than expected, considering the match conditions. He commented, “It’s better if he hadn’t bowled at all,” highlighting the inconsistency in the decision-making. According to Chopra, if Ashwin wasn’t going to be utilized properly, it didn’t make sense to have him in the team.
Source:- news 18
Ashwin’s status as the ‘fifth bowler’ was also baffling because he is often a strike bowler in crucial situations. In this match, however, he was seen playing more of a supporting role, while the frontline pacers and other spinners took center stage. Chopra and other analysts felt that India missed an opportunity to exploit Ashwin’s bowling, especially on a pitch that could have favored his spin.
This treatment of Ashwin sparked debate about India’s strategy and the balance of their bowling attack. While some felt that the team relied too heavily on their pacers, others believed that Ashwin’s talent was underutilized. Regardless of the reasons, the situation left many wondering why a player of Ashwin’s caliber wasn’t given more responsibility in the match.
Share your views in the comments
