Gehlot had raised questions about the purpose and frequency of Vice President Venkaiah Naidu’s visits to Rajasthan, suggesting that they might be politically motivated. In response, Governor Dhankar accused Gehlot of lacking an understanding of both the law and the Constitution.
The Governor’s statement reflects the ongoing political tension between the state government and the Governor’s office. Dhankar, who has had a history of disagreements with the West Bengal government, seems to be extending his criticism to other states as well, including Rajasthan.
Source:- times of India
The role of Governors in Indian states has often been a subject of debate and controversy, with accusations of political bias being common. The comments made by Jagdeep Dhankar against Ashok Gehlot are indicative of the ongoing power struggles between state governments and Governors in India.
Source:-india todayIt is important to note that the Governor’s role is largely ceremonial, and their responsibilities include performing ceremonial duties, representing the President of India in the state, and ensuring the state government functions within the framework of the Constitution. However, clashes between Governors and Chief Ministers on matters of governance and administration are not uncommon.
In conclusion, the exchange of words between Jagdeep Dhankar and Ashok Gehlot highlights the ongoing political tensions between state governments and Governors in India. While the role of Governors remains largely symbolic, these clashes often reflect the broader political dynamics and power struggles within the country’s federal structure
Share your views in the comments
