In a candid interview, Muntashir expressed frustration, pointing out what he perceives as a double standard in how his work is received compared to other content in the industry.
    The lyricist, who has penned emotional and impactful lyrics for numerous Bollywood songs, including the critically acclaimed Gully Boy, voiced his concerns regarding the selective criticism directed at his dialogues in Adipurush. Muntashir remarked, It’s disheartening to see that people take issue with certain dialogues in Adipurush but have no qualms about the lyrics in Gully Boy. This is wrong.
    Adipurush, a highly anticipated film based on the epic Ramayana, has faced scrutiny over its dialogues, with some sections of the audience expressing discomfort. Manoj Muntashir defended his work, stating that creativity should be allowed to flourish without unnecessary constraints.
    The purpose of art is to provoke thoughts, challenge perceptions, and sometimes make people uncomfortable. My dialogues in Adipurush are meant to contribute to the storytelling and character development. It’s important to appreciate the intent behind creative expression, Muntashir added.

    Source  TOI
    The lyricist highlighted the apparent inconsistency in the reception of his work, especially when compared to the widespread acclaim for his lyrics in Gully Boy, a film that delves into the world of hip-hop and street rap in Mumbai. He questioned whether the criticism was influenced by factors beyond the content itself.
    Fans and industry insiders have weighed in on the debate, with some supporting Muntashir’s artistic freedom and others expressing concerns about the portrayal of certain themes in Adipurush. The discourse reflects the ongoing dialogue about creative expression, artistic freedom, and the responsibility of content creators.
    As discussions around Adipurush continue, Manoj Muntashir’s remarks draw attention to the broader conversation about the nuances of creative freedom in the film industry. Whether his dialogues will undergo revisions or stand as they are, the controversy has ignited a pertinent dialogue about the boundaries of artistic expression and the differing standards applied to various forms of creative content.
    Share your views in the comments

    Share.

    Comments are closed.