Congress, the main opposition party in India, has been vocal in its criticism of the new building’s design and construction. They argue that the extravagant and imposing structure reflects the ruling government’s authoritarian tendencies, sidelining the principles of inclusivity and dialogue that are at the heart of a healthy democracy.
The architectural style of the new Parliament building has been described as neoclassical, with its grand pillars, domes, and vast open spaces. While proponents of the design argue that it embodies a sense of grandeur and national pride, critics, including Congress, view it as a departure from the ideals of simplicity and accessibility that characterized the old Parliament building.
Source:- the economic timesCongress leader Rahul Gandhi stated that the new building’s architecture symbolizes a shift away from the democratic ethos of India. He believes that it represents the government’s attempt to centralize power and diminish the role of opposition voices within the political process. In his view, the old Parliament building, with its colonial-era design, had a certain charm that fostered conversations and debates across party lines.
Source:-cnn news-18The debate over the new Parliament building’s architecture has also raised questions about the priorities of the government. Critics argue that the vast financial resources allocated to this project could have been better used to address pressing issues such as healthcare, education, and poverty alleviation.
Supporters of the new building’s design, on the other hand, contend that it reflects India’s aspirations to become a global power. They argue that it showcases the country’s commitment to modernity and progress on the international stage.
In conclusion, the architecture of India’s new Parliament building has become a symbol of a larger political and ideological divide in the country. While some view it as a testament to India’s ambition, others, including Congress, see it as a threat to the democratic values that have long been cherished in the world’s largest democracy. The debate over the building’s architecture is likely to continue, serving as a reminder of the complex interplay between aesthetics, politics, and democracy
Share your views in the comments
