In a tweet, Harbhajan Singh wrote, Paid to speak for tech to show tech is right. ud83eudd37u200du2642ufe0f #TechOverLogic. This cryptic comment seemed to imply that Nasser Hussain’s role as a commentator and his support for technology in cricket might be influenced by financial incentives, rather than genuine belief in its benefits.
    This isn’t the first time that the use of technology in cricket has sparked debate. The DRS, which includes ball-tracking and hotspot technology, has been a subject of controversy and discussion among players, experts, and fans. Singh’s comment reflects the ongoing divide in the cricketing world regarding the reliance on technology for umpiring decisions.
    Source:- cricket addictorNasser Hussain, known for his outspoken views, hasn’t directly responded to Harbhajan Singh’s comment. It’s essential to note that Singh’s tweet was open to interpretation, and it’s unclear whether he was making a general comment on the influence of technology in cricket or specifically targeting Hussain.
    Source:- ndtv
    The exchange highlights the passionate and sometimes polarizing nature of cricketing debates, where even former players who have transitioned into media roles can find themselves the subject of criticism. In an era where technology continues to play an increasingly significant role in the sport, discussions about its impact and influence are likely to persist
    Share your views in the comments

    Share.

    Comments are closed.