‘Rohit only chose a location to hide on the field. ‘He didn’t take a single call,’ says ex-India cricketer of India captain.

The defeat has once again called into question India’s cautious approach with the bat, as the top-order struggled mightily in the Powerplay. Their highest total after six overs was 46 against the Netherlands, with India being accused of playing an outdated brand of cricket in T20Is once again.
With Rohit Sharma already 35 and the next T20 World Cup two years away, former India pacer Atul Wassan believes it is time for a change of guard. He has backed Hardik Pandya and Rishabh Pant for the position, believing one of them can usher India’s T20 team into a new era.
Yes, I believe Rohit’s time as India’s T20 captain is up. You always plan between two World Cups, and I don’t believe Indian cricket will benefit from keeping him as captain. We will not see a return on our investment.
You have a choice between Hardik Pandya and Rishabh Pant. I’m still stunned and can’t believe what happened. I had the impression that India batted in Adelaide and England in Sharjah According to Wassan on ABP News.
Given the magnitude of the defeat, the former Indian cricketer chastised Team India for not fighting back. The fact that England won the match was undisputed, but the fact that India surrendered without picking up a single wicket is cause for concern, according to Wassan. In fact, he levelled harsh criticism at Rohit, claiming that the India captain lacked authority and that all decisions were made by team management.
source: CrickaithWe saw two levels of cricketers. At the very least, something should have occurred. You can’t even find one flaw. You can’t blame the captaincy, in my opinion. After all, all decisions were made by the team management.
Rohit Sharma did not answer a single phone call. He had only decided where he would hide on the field Wassan also contributed.