Sunil Gavaskar has offered a blunt critique of the ongoing DRS (Decision Review System) controversy involving Yashasvi Jaiswal, following his recent dismissal during India’s match. Jaiswal, who was given out after a review for an apparent edge, sparked debate when he expressed doubts about the decision, claiming that he did not hit the ball.
Source:- bbc news
Gavaskar, known for his straightforward approach, compared the situation to his own playing days, saying, “I never walked away when I edged the ball.” The former India captain emphasized the importance of accepting umpire decisions without hesitation and maintaining respect for the game. He pointed out that, in the past, players did not have the benefit of technology like DRS, and had to rely on the on-field umpire’s call, which often led to contentious decisions.
Source:- news 18
His comments come at a time when the role of DRS in modern cricket is being heavily debated. While some support its accuracy and fairness, others argue that it has created confusion and undue pressure on players. Gavaskar believes that despite the availability of technology, players should uphold the integrity of the game by not questioning on-field decisions unless absolutely necessary.
Gavaskar’s strong stance highlights the generational divide in attitudes towards umpire decisions and the use of technology. While modern players, like Jaiswal, are more vocal about disputed calls, veterans like Gavaskar believe in respecting the umpire’s authority and the spirit of the game. His comments have sparked widespread discussion, with fans and experts weighing in on the evolving role of technology in cricket.
Share your views in the comments
